Jordan Battani Resigns

She really, really wanted to be appointed to the AHS Board.  Must be tough to have all that hard work ignored.  And what about her experience, her knowledge, her expertise.  All that summarily rejected by people she perceives as not having the same grasp of the issues that she does.

What’s the word I’m looking for?

.

.

.

.

I know!  Schadenfreude.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Reason I Resigned (Closure?)

The Hospital’s continued operation results in unnecessary death.  In other words, the Hospital KILLS people.  Although I had my disagreements with my fellow Board members, I could not reconcile the moral obligation that I felt to try to do something to end these unnecessary deaths (or, to call it what it really is – negligent homicide) with the fact that I don’t believe them to be evil people (just causing an evil result).  The other conflict was that these supposedly smart and respectable people would always have a bigger and more credible platform than I would (many times I was derided for being right by fellow Board members; I vividly recall Jordan Battani, in closed session sneering at me and telling me that all I cared about was being right)  so that any effort I made to point out the fundamentally corrupt nature of the District [tax the people having the effect of increasing the amount of death in the community in exchange for jobs and respectability for pillars of  the community like Deborah Stebbins, Robert Deutsch, and Stewart Chen] was futile.

With the politically engineered merger with the County’s system, the inevitable ending of the Hospital’s existence due to an unsustainable financial model was not going to happen. The conflicts became impossible to ignore.  I wasn’t going to call them murderers  since that seemed extreme and inaccurate, but I couldn’t look at them across the table and listen to their casually arrogant lies and insults without feeling a deep hatred for each and every one of my fellow Board members.

Not at all karmically good.  So I resigned to be happier and to ignore the Hospital as much as I could.   I still occasionally check the financial statements to confirm that they continue to lose money.  I may point out to people if they ask me that the Hospital is a festering sore upon the community.  AND I certainly will never, ever voluntarily go to the Hospital or allow a member of my family to receive care there, but my relationship with the Hospital and this blog are done.

I wish each and every person who works for the Hospital good luck.  I hope you will take whatever opportunity you can to find a position in another healthcare organization that promotes wellbeing rather than one that through institutional malaise destroys health.  If changing jobs is not possible then I wish you the strength and wisdom to minimize the damage the organization as a whole does through your individual efforts.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

No Longer a Board Member

As of tomorrow, June 4, I have resigned as a Trustee of the City of Alameda Health Care District.

Although the Hospital is not something people really pay much attention to, its continued existence at a cost to the taxpayers of Alameda in both dollars and death is an embarrassment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nothing Will Change

“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.”

No posts because nothing really changes.   Consistently wrong is the mantra of the Board and Management.  Political connections trumps facts.  Perception trumps reality.  The Hospital will just go on losing money and killing people no matter how many predictions of profitability prove false or no matter how many fines, surveys, or statistics suggest that people would be better off receiving their care elsewhere.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

2/6 – Choosing a New Board Member UPDATE: CHOSEN + Embarassingly wrong about City Council

We will be interviewing and voting tonight (after an abrupt cancellation of the 1/28 special meeting).  I fully expect we will be able to come to an agreement.  As to the assertion that the City Council would choose if there was some kind of deadlock (Lauren Do’s blog); well, as with most things she writes about the Hospital, she is wrong (as far as I know and I have studied the governing laws and documents more thoroughly than she I would guess).

UPDATE:  Indeed the City Council is responsible if 60 days go by without the vacancy being filled whether due to gridlock or any other reason.  Apologies to Lauren Do.

Congratulations to Tracy Jensen the newest Board Trustee.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Happy New Year (Post more resolution edition)

Random notes:

1.  From the Board meeting:

a.  The process of referring an item to the agenda for Board consideration was clarifies although I found the earlier dual process without conflict.  The basic outline is more formal than I desire, but still preserves the prerogative of 2 Board members to add an item that the Board President opposes.

b.  The District lost only $18000 last month.  The accrual reversal was 96,000 so, without that reversal, the loss would have been about what I had previously estimated.  113,000 remains of accruals that could be reversed at Management’s discretion.

c.  The District appears to have had a strong November.  I am skeptical that this will mean a positive bottom line although it is certainly possible – it’s only one month.  Clearly the Water’s Edge acquisition offers a positive contribution, but since it comes with multiple albatrosses, not the least of which, is a requirement to keep the acute care hospital open (or it loses the “distinct part” benefit), it was the wrong direction to go.

2.  The Ninth Circuit lifted the AB97 injunction which I had anticipated to be more likely than not.  The District reserve quite a bit for this circumstance (based on what the auditor reported).  Management will report at the next Board meeting how much additional has to be reserved for this change.  The California legislature is now controlled by Democrats with a super-majority so maybe legislative relief is possible – ask Rob Bonta.

3.  The application process for the Board seat vacated by Stewart Chen is ongoing.  Thursday, January 3 is the last day to apply so, if you were considering it, you may have to scramble.  Unfortunately, there is little chance that the Board majority would allow someone with the idea of closing the Hospital on, but perhaps you enjoy quixotic efforts.   Several times I have referred to the previous application process where the odious Williams was chosen where it was ridiculously obvious that she was the designated choice.   Unless you have been solicited to apply by one of the Board majority, don’t count on having a chance of actually serving.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Nov. 7 Review of Board Meeting

1.  Minutes from last month approved.  The open session was less than 1/2 hour long.  I don’t think that’s a good thing.  Perhaps I can nitpick, but fine toothed combs are preferable to rubber stamps when you have to delouse something.

2/3 Consent for changes to the pension plan and the SEIU-UHW West MOU.

4.  The Alameda Hospital Foundation is designated as the sole fundraising/charitable donation vehicle for the District.  The Foundation, just like the rest of the Board, is way too Hospital centric, but after a minor change to the MOU, the vote to approve was unanimous.

5.  September 2012 financials.  What can you say?  Management is always upbeat even when losing tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars.  The loss this month was 190k.  This does not bode well for the year.  The total loss so far this year is 672,229.  We can take a guess as to whether October will turn around this trend. 

First, add back in the Accucare fee of 16,000 and add another 14,000 just to be generous so that Wound Care in October would help make that number a loss of 160k.

Second, let’s add in the additional net census for Waters Edge + subacute (simplifying things here).  That works out to about 4.  We will assume that adds 50k to the bottom line by multiplying $400/day X 31 and assuming no net increase in expense (rounding up).  The loss is now at 110k.

Third, the acute care census was down but the case mix index was up.  Also surgeries were up so I will just assume that the September to October delta of dollars of this segment is flat.

Overall, the District still faces a deficit of 110k for October is my best guess.  The Orthopedic program opened October 22 and almost certainly lost money for that initial time period.  We can safely assume that October will be a negative result. 

We can furthermore assume that there is, at most, another 50k of monthly margin that can be squeezed out of Waters Edge and maybe another 20k out of the wound care.  This would still mean a baseline loss per month of 40k (and I think I am being somewhat optimistic here).  I think it would be unlikely for the new surgeons to hit their stride prior to January 1 with the holidays coming up.  So let’s assume that the cumulative loss as of December 31 is 670k (1st quarter) + 110k (October) + 80k (November + December).  That is a total of 860 thousand.  The Bank of Alameda is not going to be very happy about that unless the Orthopedic program is starting to show signs of generating large amounts of cash; it would have to generate over 210 thousand a month for the District to generate $1 of net income for the year.  I don’t recall the budget numbers for the ortho program, but that sounds high to me. 

So 2012/2013 is like every other year, unless a miracle occurs, the District loses money over and above the subsidy provided by the parcel tax.  And let’s not forget the non-economic cost the District incurs in the form of poor health outcomes.

6.  2011/2012 fiscal year audit.  The auditor would have to be hit over the head with a hammer to give anything but a “clear” opinion.  They know who butters their bread.  The major change was after a series of minor adjustments which made little difference in net income, grants and donations were reclassified to an income statement account rather than being driven directly to the balance sheet.  This made the loss less for the year, but did not change the underlying numbers or dynamic.

7.  Metrics plan was approved.  I think there may be some small chance of the participants getting the 25% for the seismic part of this plan, but I don’t see much chance of them reaching the thresholds for the other pieces.

8.  Election results remain the same as the previous post.  There will be an appointed Board seat available shortly. 

9-xx.  Not much more interesting to report.  Board packet and video available on the web.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment